I copy the Council list, as we need to begin prioritizing all the various work before us, immediately.  In my view, this Work Team meeting should not be planned unless the Council decides it is a bigger priority for a face to face meeting than all of our other priorities, in particular the STI response to the Board, the RAP-WG, the RAA drafting team, etc.

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

548 Market Street

San Francisco, CA  94104

(415) 738-8087

http://rodenbaugh.com

From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:43 PM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting

Dear All,

As discussed during our meeting, in order to move the proposal for a face to face meeting forward, I’ll be developing a workplan outlining the objectives and expected deliverables of such a meeting in order to obtain internal approval. As discussed, the idea would be to provide travel funding for one active WT representative from each constituency / stakeholdergroup or AC/SO. Remote participation will be arranged for those that will not be able to attend in person. To move this forward and complete this plan, I would like to request the following information:

1. In order to determine the most appropriate and cost-effective meeting venue and have an indication of the number of participants that will require funding, could you please send me the name of the proposed funded representative from your constituency / stakeholdergroup / AC/SO and the location from where this person will be travelling
2. Please complete the following doodle (see http://www.doodle.com/u6ta33ik4r5mk52g) so we can try to find a meeting date that is most convenient to all. Please note that the idea is to have a 1,5 – 2 day meeting.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Best regards,

Marika