Dear Kurt, Desire and All,

Thanks for carefully reviewing the draft and proposing the clarifying questions to seek further details.

The suggested questions are at variance with current understanding of the board’s intent and sponsoring program and so I respectfully decline accepting this edit till we consult and reach an agreement on possible text to adopt.

The board seeks to uterlise funds from the Auction proceeds through the ICANN Grant program which has a modus operandi of granting funds to applicants rather than giving funds out as a loan.

My belief is that this edit has the potential of changing the dynamics of the ICANN Grant program as currently structured from grants to loans. I fear that the consideration of this intervention as a loan may set an unintended precedence.

The boards letter also stated that 50% of the ASP cost would be funded from application fees from the coming round which suggests that the fee charged would be reduced by half in the least.

Am happy to jump on a call with you and other interested parties to reach a compromise.

Lawrence.

Hi Kurt

Thanks for proposing to clarify the request. I would support adding those or similar sentences to Lawerence's draft.

Desiree

NA GNSO Councilor, CPH

On Friday, 23 August 2024 at 03:05, kurt kjpritz.com via council <council@icann.org> wrote:

Hi Lawerence:

Thanks for the well written email. The Registry Stakeholder group discussed and approved the position laid out in your draft but noted some lack of detail in the ICANN proposal and hope that we could add some clarifying questions to your draft.

We could put it in the following way or you can re-write it in your own style and insert it in a place you deem appropriate:

“While we support the proposition unreservedly, we note some lack of detail in the blog posting and hope that ICANN could provide that in advance of the commitment of auction proceeds for this purpose. Does ICANN propose that the use of auction proceeds be a loan to the TLD Program, to be paid back from application fees? The gTLD application fee justification recognised the Applicant Support Program as one of the costs to be covered. If the use of auction founds is not a loan, what is the effect on those application fees? If the use of these funds is a loan, what is the timing of the payback? While neither approach would affect our support of the use of auction funds, we think it is appropriate to describe and manage the implementation details of this use of funds.”

Lawerence, if you disagree with including this material, let’s have a chat at your convenience.

Best regards,

Kurt

On 13 Aug 2024, at 3:55 am, Lawrence O. Olawale-Roberts via council <council@icann.org> wrote:

Sir Osvaldo,

Many Thanks for the feedback.

LOR

Get Outlook for iOS

From: Osvaldo Novoa <osvaldo.j.novoa@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 12:27:39 PM
To: Lawrence O. Olawale-Roberts <lawrence@microboss.org>
Cc: council@gnso.icann.org <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Board Letter on ASP

Dear Lawrence,
Thank you for the draft response. I support it, excellent work.

Best regards,

Osvaldo

On 11Aug, 2024, at 20:23, Lawrence O. Olawale-Roberts via council <council@icann.org> wrote:

Dear All,

I committed to turning in a draft as a response to the boards letter seeking $5M in funding for ASP from the Auction Proceeds.

Kindly find my draft below:

From: The ICANN GNSO Council

To: The ICANN Board

Dear Tripti,

We write in response to your letter asking for input on new gTLD Applicant Support Program (ASP) use of $5M in Auction proceeds.

It is our understanding that the ICANN Board and Org. seek a workaround to provide adequate funding to kick off the Applicant Support Program prior to the commencement of the next round of New gTLD application round.

The GNSO Council support this intervention as we believe it is not in variance with advise previously provided the board through the Applicant Support Program GGP process, and we also believe this would enhance the success of the ASP such that a repeat of the challenges identified with the previous round would be avoided.

It is our understanding also that by this action, meaningful support would be provided for up to 45 new gTLD applicants or an anticipated full support for at least half that number of applicants.

The GNSO Council will continue to evaluate progress made with the ASP and provide feedback deemed necessary.

DiBiase, Gregory

GNSO Council Chair

Lawrence.

Get Outlook for iOS

_______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.