Will let Julf/Susan elaborate, but I'm presuming this means the selection would be a consent agenda item by default, but noting that -any- motion on the Consent Agenda item can be pulled out for a discussion/vote/deferral upon request of a Councilor.

Thanks -

On Jun 23, 2017, 10:07 +0200, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>, wrote:

Thanks Julf,

but maybe I misunderstood. I mean the reference in the motion to the consent agenda of the future meetings where the council is supposed to sanction the leadership's proposal (see Resolved 1d: ...Following this determination, this decision is to be confirmed by the GNSO Council as part of the consent agenda...).

What is the SSC's rationale for this?

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

Am 20.06.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Johan Helsingius:

Wolf-Ulrich,

I've only one question: what is the SSC's rationale (under Res. 1d) to
put this decision on the councils _consent_ agenda?

No rationale, purely an off-by-one error on my part.
It is supposed to be Item 4 on the agenda. My apologies!

        Julf

_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council