On Dec 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Avri Doria <avri@ella.com> wrote:

Hi,

Please forgive me for coming late to this topic.

Just reading the report now, and am wondering about:

- have these results been extensively presented to the community and discussed with them? (I confessed I missed it).
- what provisions are being made on the remaining issues as reported in the report?

Specifically:
"
 The  DSSA  believes  that  if  the  Phase  2  effort  should  be  undertaken  under  an  updated  charter,  and  by  a  new  group  of  volunteers  with  additional  expertise  should  lead  that  effort.  These  volunteers  will  need  to  be  aware  that  Phase  2  will  take  a  considerable  effort  to  conclude  (both  in  intensity  and  duration  of  the  work
"

If I missed the discussions on the mailing list, phrase point me to the correct archive.

Or is this something that will be discussed at some other time? What other time?

Thanks
~~~
avri

Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com> wrote:
hi all,

my apologies for not noticing this sooner, but i have made some very minor changes to the DSSA motion.  i did not proofread my own motion before sending it along and a couple of things needed to be changed from the ccNSO motion that i used as a basis for ours.

i've attached a redline for your review and am looking for guidance as to the correct way to introduce these changes.  

i do not believe any of these chances are substantive.

thanks,

mikey




PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)



PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)