Hi Rafik, all,

Staff actually looked back at the original motion and our understanding is that at the time of the adoption of the motion the Council forgot to fill in a name or no volunteer had come forward as after the last ‘and’ the original version had brackets in that place (and [name] to serve as GNSO Council liaison to the group) as the GNSO Council liaison has to be a Council member.

Best regards,

Marika 

From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday 20 May 2015 10:08
To: Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org>
Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>
Subject: [council] GNSO Council agenda: Item 6: UPDATE - Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance

Submitted by Rafik Dammak :

 

….can you please share this motion with GNSO council for the confcall https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+15+October+2014 it sounds like the council forgot that it already appointed me as GNSO liaison :/

 

the agenda item is :"The GNSO Council does not currently have a Council liaison to the CWG. Separately, the CWG has submitted a recent request to its Chartering Organizations to confirm interpretation of the chartered role of observers/participants in its work. Here the Council will receive an update on the CWG’s progress, discuss both the liaison issue, and consider a non-objection to the CWG’s proposed interpretation of the Charter.

 

"

while the motion says : "As the charter calls for each of the chartering organizations to appoint a co-chair for the group, the GNSO Council appoints Rafik Dammak to serve as a member of the CWG-IG, to serve as the GNSO co-chair of the CWG-IG and to serve as GNSO Council liaison to the group."


Kind regards,
Glen

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org