Dear Mary,


I would be very grateful if you could clarify please your statement at the end of the email below ("It is anticipated that approval of this Recommendations Report will be on the Council’s agenda for the 18 February meeting."). Is some affirmative step needed to put this item on the February Council agenda? It's the phrase "it is anticipated" that I'm not clear on, and given the deadline for 18 February agenda items, I'd be grateful to hear back from you as soon as possible.


Many thanks and best wishes,

Heather



From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 4:54
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] For your review: Recommendations Report to the ICANN Board on Privacy/Proxy Services Accreditation Issues
 
Dear Councilors,

Please find attached for your review a Recommendations Report from the GNSO Council to the ICANN Board  concerning the recently-adopted PDP recommendations on privacy and proxy services accreditation issues. As you’ll recall, this Report is mandated by the ICANN Bylaws, and upon your approval it will be transmitted to the ICANN Board along with the Final Report (containing in full all the recommendations) from the PDP Working Group.

You may be interested also to know that, again as mandated by the ICANN Bylaws, a public comment forum has just been opened to give the public a reasonable opportunity to comment on the recommendations prior to any action by the ICANN Board: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ppsai-recommendations-2016-02-05-en.


It is anticipated that approval of this Recommendations Report will be on the Council’s agenda for the 18 February meeting.

Thanks and cheers
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong@icann.org
Telephone: +1-603-5744889