Please find a couple more edits. Thanks for everyone’s help on this letter. I believe we should send this out after our wrap up session.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 3:29 PM
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Draft of Note to send to the GAC re: IOC/Red Cross Names

Done, and attached. Added the word "Olympic" to the first paragraph (as I believe that's what John suggested), my suggestions to paragraph 3 and a couple of typographical fixes.

Cheers

Mary

Mary W S Wong

Professor of Law

Chair, Graduate IP Programs

Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP

UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW

Two White Street

Concord, NH 03301

USA

Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu

Phone: 1-603-513-5143

Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php

Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584

>>>

From:	Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
To:	<Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu>
CC:	"GNSO Council" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Date:	10/26/2011 10:48 AM
Subject:	Re: [council] Proposed Draft of Note to send to the GAC re: IOC/Red Cross Names

Hi all,

Could I please ask you to make your edits in the word doc that I sent previously? It's getting difficult for me to track the suggested edits.

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 26 oct. 2011 à 09:28, <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> a écrit :

Sorry for jumping in late on this, and thanks to Stephane, Kristina, John, Alan, Tim and others who commented and edited.

One comment/suggestion - rather than ask the GAC the question about reservations at the second level (paragraph 3), I suggest collapsing the second (which contains the question) and third sentences to read "We understand this to refer to exact matches of those marks, and that the Proposal will not impact current domain name registrations in existing top-level domains".