Hi again,

Having taken another look at the motion, it says:

The GNSO Council agrees to jointly implement with the GAC, the preliminary recommendations by the CG concerning the issue scoping phase of the PDP as outlined here http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gac-cg-issue-scoping-27jan15-en.pdf on a trial basis for a minimum of 3 GNSO PDPs.

So, I guess this answers my previous question. We’re not talking about 3 consecutive PDPs, but rather 3 PDPs in which a QLM is used by the GAC.

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:11 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org> wrote:

Hi,

I would have been happy to second this motion, but Phil was quicker on the draw than I was. :)

I do have one question, though. When the motion refers to an “end of this trial period”, what exactly is the end?

Is it the end of the issue scoping phase of the third PDP a Quick Look Mechanism (QLM) Committee actually tackles? Or is it the end of the third PDP in its totality taking into account the QLM’s effectiveness (or lack of) in encouraging GAC continued engagement in the PDP? This could also take into account the GAC’s engagement in the PDP during the following phases beyond the issue scoping, should a QLM Committee determine that there is or may be public policy implications?

Another meaning for “end of this trial period” may be three consecutive PDPs whether or not the GAC actually succeed in creating a QLM Committee to look into the issue scoping phase.

Just trying to get a clear picture in my head on what the metrics of success associated with this motion may be from a GNSO perspective. They are probably different depending on what is meant by the “end”.

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:14 PM, Phil Corwin <psc@vlaw-dc.com> wrote:

I am happy to second this motion so that it is in order for discussion at the March 19 Council meeting.
 
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
 
Twitter: @VlawDC
 
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
 
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 1:34 PM
To: <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] Motion to implement the recommendations of the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group
 
Dear All!
 
Please find attached for your consideration a motion considering the GAC – GNSO Consulting Group Preliminary Recommendations on Issue Scoping.
 
A seconder for the motion would be appreciated.
 
Thank you.
 
 
Kind regards
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
_____________________

email: crg@isoc-cr.org
Skype: carlos.raulg
+506 8837 7176 (cel)
+506 4000 2000 (home)
+506 2290 3678 (fax)
_____________________
Apartado 1571-1000
San Jose, COSTA RICA
 
 

 

 
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4299/9218 - Release Date: 03/03/15