I have communicated the Council's concern to David Olive, with whom I have been liaising on this. I do not have any more information on this meeting at this point. It is my view that the meeting should either not be formal, in which case a 2-day meeting does not seem necessary and it may suffice to organise a dinner or some other social get-together event, or it should be formal in which case there is a set agenda and everything is recorded and transcribed as per any ICANN meeting. Stéphane Le 23 janv. 2011 à 09:57, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :
Why can't Rod comment directly describing his intention? He has access to the list.
I think you need a bullet point added if, indeed, it does go ahead (which I am against).
- if the meeting takes place the meetings must be recorded and transcribed and made available within 48 hours to ensure the content can be discussed at the ICANN Meeting.
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 1:38 AM To: <KnobenW@telekom.de> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: [council] SO and AC Chairs meeting with Rod before SF
Thanks for those excellent suggestions Wolf.
What do others think about this approach, which I would support as it sends a more gentle signal than simply "we're not going to attend"?
- communicate to ICANN that the council has some reservations regarding this meeting - if the meeting takes place you should attend - provide a comprehensive report to the GNSO weekend session
Stéphane