I forwarded the following
message to the Council the yesterday and added the topic to our agenda for our
meeting under Other Business. Unfortunately, as we ran out of time, I
failed to cover it. My intent was to simply ask if anyone objected to
considering the formation of a WG as described by Chris and if not, to request
volunteers to start working on a possible charter with volunteers from the
ccNSO. So I will ask those questions now:
1.
Does anyone object
to considering the formation of such a WG? Note that we would not make an
official decision to support such a WG until after we see a draft charter.
If anyone objects, please communicate your objection not later than next
Wednesday, 16 June.
2.
Assuming there is no
opposition, who would like to volunteer for the charter drafting team?
Note that this is not a request for volunteers for what might eventually be a
WG, but only for a charter DT.
Regarding question 2, there have
already been some volunteers in response to my message yesterday:
·
Terry Davis (NCA)
·
Rafik Damik (NCSG)
·
Greg Aaron (RySG,
Afilias)
·
Kathy Kleiman (RySG,
PIR)
·
Keith Drazek (RySG,
VeriSign).
If anyone else wants to
volunteer, please communicate your interest on this list not later than next
Wednesday, 16 June. We will then communicate the names and contact
information to the ccNSO.
Thanks, Chuck
From: Chris Disspain
[mailto:ceo@auda.org.au]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 9:54 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: 'Cheryl Langdon-Orr'
Subject: Joint Working Group to consider concept of DNS CERT
Chuck,
In
our conversation last week we discussed the possibility of the gNSO and ccNSO
(along with other relevant ACs and independent experts) setting up the working
group contemplated in the joint Chair’s letter to ICANN of 25 March 2010 as
soon as possible.
I
put this proposal to the ccNSO council on our call of 8 June and confirm that
the council has agreed that in the event of the proposal also being agreed by
the gNSO council, a small joint drafting team should work before Brussels to
draft the charter for the establishment of a Working Group comprising
representatives of ICANN’s Security and Stability Advisory Committee,
Root Server System Advisory Committee, GAC, ALAC, CERT operators and ccTLD and
gTLD managers to draw upon their collective expertise and to solicit their
input on:
·
the broad concept of a
DNS-CERT;
·
the current work being
undertaken to mitigate DNS-related threats;
·
the actual level,
frequency and severity of these threats;
·
the gaps (if any) in the current
security response to DNS issues;
·
whether or not a DNS-CERT
is a proposal they support; and
·
if so, the logistics of
the proposal.
The
goal would be to have the charter approved by the ccNSO and gNSO in Brussels if
possible so that we can announce the formation of the working group. I’m
guessing that formally the working group will need to be a joint gNSO ccNSO
group (as the 2 relevant supporting organisations that can actually make
policy) with the charter mandating the involvement of the relevant ACs and
outside experts.
In
the event that the gNSO council does approve the proposal then the action items
will be a) to call for some volunteers to do the drafting along with Bart
Boswinkel as ccNSO staff and an equivalent gNSO person and b) to approach the
other ACs to inform them that this is occurring.
I
understand your council meets on 10 June 2010 and look forward to hearing from
you regarding your discussions.
Cheers,
Chris
Disspain | Chief Executive
Officer
.au
Domain Administration Ltd
T:
1300 732 929 | F:
03 8341 4112
E: ceo@auda.org.au | W:www.auda.org.au
auDA
- The Australian Domain Name Administrator
Important Notice - This email may
contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege,
and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you
have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this
email.
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5183 (20100608) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com