Adrian,
As you know, the Council is
tasked with managing the policy development process. In that context it
seems to me that there are elements of ICANN staffing that are relevant to what
the Council does. In my opinion policy development involves following up
on the implementation of policies as well as on their ultimate success or
failure and improving them over time, all of which can be impacted by ICANN’s
staffing.
When we start talking about staff
turnover though, there is risk of treading into confidential personnel
information, so there is reason for caution. Therefore I think it is
critical that we stay at a high level and avoid talking about specific
personnel and specific personnel decisions.
Chuck
From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf
Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 9:15 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] ICANN staff
Chuck,
Quick question.
Is it the Council’s place or business
to question the status of staffing at ICANN?
I may be reading this wrong but there seems
to have been a spike in staff turnover in the last 12 months.
I could be wrong and this could simply be a
case of normal activity but it causes some concern to me when we have a
particularly important 12 months. I am sure we would all like to ensure that
ICANN is appropriately staffed, with talented and importantly, DNS experienced
people to progress the strategic plan and that the existing staff are supported
and managed through this stressful period.
As I say, I am not sure it is our place to
question or comment.
Perhaps we could notify our representatives
on the Board that we believe it to be an issue, if indeed we deem it to be one?
Thanks.
Adrian
Kinderis