Hi Wolf-Ulrich.


1. Shouldn’t the letter be addressed to the OEC chair?  
— Good catch, I agree.

2. Do we expect action/approval from the OEC or board re starting the implementation planning? Then we should express it.
— Yes, we should establish this expectation

Thanks—

J.




From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>
Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 5:54
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO Review WP Analysis

Thanks Marika,
 
1. Shouldn’t the letter be addressed to the OEC chair?
 
2. Do we expect action/approval from the OEC or board re starting the implementation planning? Then we should express it.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:45 AM
Subject: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO Review WP Analysis
 
Dear All,
 
Please find attached for your review, the proposed transmittal letter to the Board’s Organisational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) concerning the adoption by the GNSO Council of the GNSO Review Working Party’s Feasibility and Prioritisation Analysis of the GNSO Review recommendations. As you will note, placeholder language has been included to accommodate any additional comments GNSO Council members may want to include concerning the feasibility and priority of the GNSO Review recommendations, as discussed during the Council meeting.
 
If you want to add any comments in relation to the feasibility and prioritisation of the recommendations, please provide those at the latest by Friday 22 April. As noted during the Council meeting as well as pointed out in the draft letter, the next phase of work will focus on the development of the implementation plan so any comments related to that aspect of the process should be reserved for the next phase.
 
Thanks,
 
Marika