I am very sorry to have missed the last meeting....but I have a few objections on behalf of my stakeholder group regarding the "aspirational statement". In the first place, the use of the word "shall" is not asirational, it is declaratory. We cannot agree with that. We reserve to right to vote against something, whilst supporting the aspiration of reaching as much concensus as possible, and of rescuing any recommendations where there is a consensus. I am checking with my SG but I figured I had better let you know right away, please check the google doc. Cheers Stephanie Perrin On 2024-03-05 3:06 p.m., Anne ICANN via council wrote:
Thanks Caitlin. Regarding the aspirational statement, there is one typo as to the word "followed" which should be "follows".
In a more substantive comment, the statement does not make any references to the level of consensus obtained in the Working Group. Full consensus is one possible outcome in PDP Recommendations. Several other levels of consensus exist and one wonders how the different levels of consensus would affect the aspirational statement.
Thank you, Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2024 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 12:57 PM Caitlin Tubergen via council <council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councilors,
Please find two documents that will be discussed during tomorrow’s GNSO Council meeting for Agenda Item 9: Any Other Business.
9.2 - *Updated Small Team Guidelines*: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j5vDURSuz65R1gZxgxLKsK9H5cI_ux0YixAP9XhS...
* As a reminder, the Council discussed the Small Team Guidelines during its SPS and agreed to edit the guidelines to address some of the concerns articulated by Community members; namely, the Council agreed to remove references to “informal” in an effort to communicate that the work of small teams is conducted transparently and is an important tool in advancing the Council’s work.
9.4 - *Aspirational Statement*: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l6vnCp1njSgG0rfLVIwtpEcv953RyC4UAgL660LI...
* As a reminder, the Council discussed developing an aspirational statement during its SPS. Specifically, the Council agreed to this action item: “Council to develop an aspirational (non-binding) statement to reflect that Councilors should not seek to undo bottom-up consensus-driven outcomes of GNSO WGs.” Leadership worked on the above first draft for your consideration.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Caitlin
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.