Hi Mikey,

Yeah…, I sent all the docs to the WG list. Great stuff. Thanks for the comments.

Amr

On Mar 16, 2014, at 9:31 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com> wrote:

hi all,

i’m liking this more and more — Amr, did you also forward your responses and my replies to the PI WG list as well?  another important piece of the conversation.

this is probably enough of a starter-kit.  i like Chuck’s suggestion that we pick the conversation up at the WG meeting on Wednesday — i will make it a point to attend that one.

thanks Chuck!

mikey


On Mar 16, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org> wrote:

Hi again,

Chuck sent a few responses to Mikey’s questions, and he asked that I pass them along to the Council, so here they are.

Thanks.

Amr

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>
Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: [council] Message from Policy & Implementation WG
Date: March 16, 2014 at 7:54:36 PM GMT+1

Thank you very much for sending Mikey’s feedback to the WG list Amr.  That is very helpful.  To save all members from going to the Council email archives, it would be helpful if you also forwarded your response(s) to the P&I WG list.
 
I attached versions of the two documents with my personal responses to Mikey’s input.  I encourage WG members to review them to facilitate our discussion of them in our WG meeting in Singapore.
 
Amr – If you think it would be useful, please feel free to forward my personal responses to Mikey and/or the full Council.
 
Chuck
 
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:24 PM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: [council] Message from Policy & Implementation WG
 
Hi all,
 
The “Principles” and “Working Definitions” documents have been sent to the GNSO Council as an update on the WG’s progress. Mikey O’Connor had some comments attached below. I’ve already provided a preliminary response, but believe it’s important to have the WG collectively look at these as well, consider them and provide responses as it sees fit.
 
Thanks.
 
Amr
 
Begin forwarded message:


From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@haven2.com>
Subject: Re: [council] Message from Policy & Implementation WG
Date: March 16, 2014 at 4:03:40 PM GMT+1
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>
 
hi all,
 
these look great.  i marked them up with the questions that popped out at me as i read them.  i was doing this mostly as notes to myself and intended to just bring these up on Saturday.  but i’ve attached them to this reply in case time grows tight in Singapore.  these are my reactions as an individual and have not been reviewed by the ISPCP.
 
great start!  
 
mikey
 
 
 
 
On Mar 14, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:


Dear All,
 
On behalf of the Policy & Implementation Working Group I would like to share with you the working definitions and working principles (under final review) that the WG has developed to facilitate its deliberations on the charter questions. You are encouraged to share these with your respective groups and share any feedback you may have with the WG either during its update to the GNSO in Singapore or as part of its F2F meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 26 March from 15.30 – 17.00 SGT in room Sophia, please see http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-policy-implementation. 
 
Best regards,
 
Marika
<PI Working Principles For Review in Singapore.doc><PI Proposed Working Definitions - 19 February 2014.doc>
 

PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
 
 
<PI Proposed Working Definitions - 19 February 2014 - Mikey with Gomes responses.doc>
<PI Working Principles For Review in Singapore - Mikey with Gomes responses.doc>



PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)