Rosemary,
I can assist.
Debbie
Debra Y. Hughes l Senior
Counsel
American Red Cross
Office of the General Counsel
2025 E Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Phone: (202) 303-5356
Fax: (202) 303-0143
HughesDeb@usa.redcross.org
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010
2:22 PM
To: rosemary.sinclair@atug.org.au
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Future GNSO
Activity? Re - .job Reconsideration Request
Hi Rosemary,
Thanks for offering to take the lead on this. I think that would be
most helpful.
Would anyone else like to volunteer to work with Rosemary on this?
Stéphane
Le 12 déc. 2010 à 17:59, rosemary.sinclair@atug.org.au
a écrit :
Hi Stephane
I hosted a workshop in Catragena on Consumer Choice and Trust as per AoC
This topic came up as one of our discussion points
I'd be happy to take responsibilty for progressing this work in GNSO and with
the other groups if that would be of assistance
Cheers
Rosemary
Sent from
my BlackBerry® from Optus
From: Stéphane Van
Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
Sender: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec
2010 03:45:51 +1100
To: Neuman,
Jeff<Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>
Cc: 'GNSO
Council'<council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re:
[council] Future GNSO Activity? Re - .job Reconsideration Request
Thanks Jeff.
I am working on the agenda for our next Council meeting and the two
Cartagena Board resolutions that referenced the GNSO will be included in that
agenda as discussion items.
There's res8, as you mention, and res6, where the Board is asking
that Resolved
(2010.12.10.30), the ICANN Board requests advice from the ALAC, GAC, GNSO and ccNSO
on establishing the definition, measures, and three year targets for those
measures, for competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the context of
the domain name system, such advice to be provided for discussion at the ICANN
International Public meeting in San Francisco from 13-18 March 2010.
There's actually very little time for us to start working on this and
be ready by SF.
As people wind down from the Cartagena meeting, it's possibly not the
best time to start looking at these two action items right now. But I will be
asking the Council to do so in the upcoming weeks and, as mentioned, I would
then like us to discuss during our Jan 13 meeting.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 12 déc. 2010 à 16:12, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
FYI, saw this resolution passed on the reconsideration
request for a registry service by .jobs. Although the
reconsideration request was denied, there is a reference in the BGC
recommendation that asks the GNSO to consider a process to evaluate amendments
that may have the effect of changing, or seeking to change, an sTLD Charter or
stated purpose of a sponsored, restricted or community-based TLD.
The BGC report can be found at: http://www.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf.
The Resolution is below:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Whereas,
the BGC has reviewed and considered Reconsideration Request 10-2 submitted by
the .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition on 20 August 2010 (supplemented as
posted at <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/board-governance/requests-for-reconsideration-en.htm>)
concerning the Board's 5 August 2010 resolution approving Employ Media’s
.JOBS Phased Allocation Program.
Whereas,
the BGC recommended that the Request be denied as unsupported because: (i) the
Coalition’s concerns regarding potential violations of the Charter in the
implementation of the Phased Allocation Program is not a proper ground for
reconsidering the Board’s 5 August 2010 Action; and (ii) the Board did
not fail to consider material information available at the time of the Action.
Whereas,
the BGC recommended that the Board direct the President and CEO, and General
Counsel and Secretary, to ensure that ICANN’s Contractual Compliance
Department closely monitor Employ Media’s compliance with its Charter.
Whereas, the BGC recommended that the Board direct the CEO to create
a briefing paper for the GNSO to consider on this matter, and for the GNSO to
determine whether a policy development process should be commenced.
Whereas,
the Reconsideration Request and the BGC's Recommendation has been posted on the
ICANN website <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/board-governance/requests-for-reconsideration-en.htm>.
Resolved
(2010.12.10.35), the Board adopts the Recommendation of the BGC on
Reconsideration Request 10-2.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. /
Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / jeff.neuman@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
The information contained in this e-mail
message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
and delete the original message.