+1 with the same question as Jeff
De: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de Neuman, Jeff
Enviada em: terça-feira, 10 de maio de 2011 14:13
Para: Rosette, Kristina; 'Adrian Kinderis'; Stéphane Van Gelder; council@gnso.icann.org GNSO
Assunto: RE: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)
Completely agree with Adrian and Kristina. I still want to ask how (or why) is it that the ALAC had a chance for a complete review before we even got a draft?
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 1:06 PM
To: 'Adrian Kinderis'; Stéphane Van Gelder; council@gnso.icann.org GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)
+1 with Adrian and I'd also note that, as far as I know, the GNSO Council didn't get the report until the 8th.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:57 PM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder; council@gnso.icann.org GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)
I find the text a little misleading.
I do not think it states strongly enough that the GNSO has not reviewed nor does it have a current position on the Board.
Stephane – can you email the Board directly and let them know, separately, the GNSO’s understanding and status with this report?
Thanks.
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 2:13 AM
To: council@gnso.icann.org GNSO
Subject: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)
Councillors,
Please find below the message sent by ALAC to the Board.
Début du message réexpédié :
Date : 10 mai 2011 10:57:20 HAEC
Objet : Réexp : Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)
Dear Stéphane,
please be so kind to receive a copy of the finalised JAS Second Milestone Report, as transmitted by the ALAC to the Board.
As mentioned in the staff intro, another message from the ALAC will be sent to the Board after the expiry of the ALAC comment period at the end of the week. This will include an erratum to fix small errors/inconsistencies pointed out by our membership. I shall also forward of copy of that follow-up message to you.
Kind regards,
Olivier
-------- Message original --------
The At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to you, on behalf of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group ( JAS WG) (attached). We request that this Report be forwarded to the members of the ICANN Board.
The main objective of the JAS WG is to develop a sustainable approach in providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDs Registries.
This Report was received by the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) on 6 May 2011 and is currently undergoing evaluation. Comments from the At-Large Community are now being gathered until 13 May 2011 and will be transmitted to the Board in a separate document. The ALAC ratification process will follow, the results of which will also be sent to the Board.
Please note that GNSO approval of this document is being conducted independently and has not reached the approval stage.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber-White, and Marilyn Vernon
ICANN At-Large Staff
email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org
website: www.atlarge.icann.org