We are scheduled to discuss the agenda on
our call on Thursday.
As the liaison, I appreciate all your
comments and feedback.
For now, the short answer is that there
were many limitations in the schedule, including availability of suitable
rooms, overlapping events, etc. In addition, the Registrars have requested two
full days of meeting, and they are already being shortchanged due to all the
other conflicting meetings on Tuesday. We are trying to give them as much time
for their meeting and work as possible.
We need to keep in mind that since we need
four of the Registrars for the Council public forum – Jordyn, as the
chair of the WHOIS TF, and the three councilors from the Consitutency, it is a
courtesy to start the gNSO Public Forum as late as we can. Especially since the
Public Forum is chaired by the Council chair, who is from the Registrar
Constiutency.
It might be feasible to start 30 minutes
earlier on the gNSO Public Forum. I am not making a commitment on that at this
time, however. I am talking to Bruce and Diane later today.
Like many of you, I am actually more
concerned about the timing of the Public Forum. but I noticed none of the
Councilors posting so far mentioned that. Kiyoshi and Ken, as WHOIS TF
members, are aware that the TF will be taking public comments. Thus we need to
do this when we can have attendance by a wide number of stakeholders. This
topic bears some thought from all of you.
In the end, we may need to be good sports
and demonstrate our flexibility. While we started trying to work with the
staff a few weeks, ago, circumstances turned out to limit the flexibility –
and the venue has some limitations.
Given the limitations of the schedule we
were given, the only other feasible time to have the Council was Thursday p.m. and
that is not a good idea, given that we may have comments to present at the
public forum for the Board’s attention.
However, I see a couple of things that
will be changed. The report on domain name hi-jacking is one hour in length, I
think. Steve Crocker is involved in both that and the DNS Sec workshop, which
then begins at 10. I understand he plans to do two DNSSEC workshops: one in Luxemboourg,
and one in Vancover.
Secondly, the public forum, part I is missing,
but it is Wednesday p.m. so, just add that to your mental notes when you read
the schedule.
Finally, as to in our using the Council
list to schedule bar time, does that mean that everyone who reads the list should
assume Philip is inviting you along for a drink, now joined by Kiyoshi and Ken?
J
Marilyn
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On
Behalf Of Kiyoshi I. Tsuru
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:11
AM
To: 'Ken Stubbs'; 'Philip
Sheppard'
Cc: 'names council'
Subject: RE: [council]
Yes, me too
Agustín Manuel Chávez 1 - 001
Centro de Ciudad
01210, México, D.F.
Tel. +52 (55) 5292-5232 x 105
Fax +52 (55) 5292-5233
www.bemt.com.mx
La información contenida en este mensaje de datos es
confidencial, constituye un secreto industrial en términos de la legislación
vigente y se encuentra dirigida exclusivamente al destinatario indicado en
dicho mensaje. Si usted recibe esta información por error o si usted no es el
destinatario del mensaje, favor de destruirlo inmediatamente, absteniéndose de
leerlo, reproducirlo, transmitirlo, almacenarlo, divulgarlo, revelarlo o usarlo
de manera directa o indirecta en cualquier forma y por cualquier
medio. Muchas gracias.
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential,
privileged and intended for its recipient only. If you receive this mail by
mistake and/or if you are not the recipient thereof, please destroy it
immediately, abstaining yourself from reading, reproducing, transmitting,
storing, disclosing, revealing or using it, either directly or indirectly, in
any manner and by any means. Thank you very much.
From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Ken Stubbs
Sent: Lunes, 20 de Junio de 2005
08:07 a.m.
To: Philip Sheppard
Cc: 'names council'
Subject: Re: [council]
I would echo this request
Ken Stubbs
Philip Sheppard wrote:
Could Council have some background as to why our most
important meeting of the entire week is scheduled from 17.00 - 19.00 ?
Are we at our best then? Alert, excited and ready for
intelligent debate and focused action?
Or by then are we ready for the bar?
I know I will be.
Re schedule please.
What's wrong with earlier ?
Philip