Thanks Dan.

From: Reed, Daniel A [mailto:dan-reed@uiowa.edu]
Sent: 12 June 2014 18:26
To: jrobinson@afilias.info; council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board

Transparency on decision processes is what I hear most often with respect to the ICANN board (relates to bypassing processes).

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 7:37 AM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board

All,

Please can you provide input as to the topics your SG and/or Constituency would like to see the Council (bearing in mind the role and function of the Council) raise and discuss with the ICANN board in our meeting in London.

A couple of ideas:

- An update on key themes of the work of the Council and associated policy work in the GNSO (Keeping this very short)

o GNSO / GAC CG

o PDP improvements

o Other?

- Effective and appropriate management of policy work in the ICANN structures.
A point related to concerns over bypassing policy processes.  Has this improved, got worse or stayed the same?

- A N Other

Jonathan