![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d33996386899f76de2ac41f425ac5a10.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
29 Jan
2010
29 Jan
'10
9:44 a.m.
Tim, On Jan 29, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
There were no questions or objections raised regarding that sentence so I believe it was assumed to be part of the letter.
On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
I disagree with the characterization and it will likely be an issue among other Non-contracted party councilors. Nonetheless, I agree that the letter should go to Council for review, and we can tinker with it later.