Hi Wolf-Ulrich -

Just received all of the submissions from the sub team, and am in the process of assembling these. Once complete, we will circulate to the main Council list.

Apologies for the delay, and thanks for your patience.  Please watch for something in the next 24 hours.

Thanks—

J.

From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>
Date: Monday, January 11, 2016 at 0:38
To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>, James Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com>, GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report

James and team,
 
when we’ll have your findings available?

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 
From: WUKnoben
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report
 
Thanks James and team,
 
if you could make available the findings before the upcoming weekend this would be very helpful with respect to the timely coordination within the SGs/C’s.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich
 
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 10:08 PM
Subject: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report
 
Colleagues -
 
Attached and copied below, please find a Motion for consideration during our special session on 14 JAN to consider the Recommendations contained in the Third Draft CCWG-Accountability report.  The small sub team reviewing comments submitted by SGs and Cs met today, and finalization of the findings/comments contained in the motion will be completed between now and our meeting.
 
Please note that on todays call we also raised the possibility that a GNSO response might be more informal (e.g., letter) rather than a formal motion.  This will also be part of our discussion on the 14th, but I wanted to have the motion submitted to the list in the event that we choose this approach.
 
Thanks—
 
J.
 
 
 Motion on GNSO Joint Position on CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

 

Whereas,

 

<!--[if !supportLists]-->1.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council, together with other ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, chartered the Cross-Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) on 13 November 2014 ‘to deliver proposals that would enhance ICANN’s accountability towards all stakeholders.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->2.     <!--[endif]-->The CCWG-Accountability published its third draft proposal for public comment on 30 November 2015 (see https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-2015-11-30-en).

<!--[if !supportLists]-->3.     <!--[endif]-->All GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and/or Constituencies (Cs) submitted their input on the third draft proposal and its 12 recommendations.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->4.     <!--[endif]-->A GNSO Council sub-team was formed to review the input submitted by the GNSO SG/Cs and make a recommendation to the GNSO Council concerning a possible joint GNSO position on the third draft proposal .

<!--[if !supportLists]-->5.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council has reviewed the input provided by the sub-team on the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal.

 

Resolved,

 

<!--[if !supportLists]-->1.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council views on the recommendations contained in the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal are as follows:

 

Recommendation #1

Establishing An Empowered Community For Enforcing Community Powers for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #2

Empowering The Community Through Consensus: Engage, Escalate, Enforce for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #3

Redefining ICANN’s Bylaws As ‘Standard Bylaws’ And ‘Fundamental Bylaws’ for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #4

Ensuring Community Involvement In ICANN Decision-Making: Seven New Community Powers for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #5

Changing Aspects Of ICANN's Mission, Commitments And Core Values for more information)

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #6

Reaffirming ICANN's Commitment to Respect Internationally Recognized Human Rights as it Carries Out Its Mission for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #7

Strengthening ICANN's Independent Review Process for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #8

Improving ICANN's Request For Reconsideration Process for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #9

Incorporation of the Affirmation of Commitments for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #10

Enhancing the Accountability of Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #11

Board obligations regarding GAC Advice

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

Recommendation #12

Committing to further accountability work in Work Stream 2

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments

 

 

<!--[if !supportLists]-->2.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Secretariat to share this GNSO Council input on the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal with the Chairs of the CCWG-Accountability as soon as possible.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->3.     <!--[endif]-->Although this GNSO input is submitted after the close of the public comment period, the GNSO Council expects the CCWG-Accountability to give this input due consideration as it is the aggregation of the individual GNSO SG/C positions that were submitted before the deadline.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->4.     <!--[endif]-->The GNSO Council appreciates all the efforts of the CCWG-Accountability to deliver its final proposal to the Chartering Organizations in a timely manner and looks forward to considering the final proposal in due time.