All,

Noting that David’s motion has now been amended here:

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+04+September+2014

I hereby withdraw my motion.

Thanks,

Jonathan

From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org]
Sent: 03 September 2014 10:17
To: David Cake
Cc: jrobinson@afilias.info; council@gnso.icann.org; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery
Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC

Same here. Thanks Jonathan and David.

Amr

On Sep 3, 2014, at 10:36 AM, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote:

This sounds very sensible to me.

David

On 2 Sep 2014, at 11:51 pm, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

All,

This needs to be tidied up . The motions appear identical but mine actually has a couple of minor changes to the wording.

Therefore, I propose the following:

1. That my wording is a friendly amendment to David’s motion (hopefully acceptable to David & Amr)

2. I withdraw my motion and we remove the confusion of the two (near) identical motions.

Thanks,

Jonathan

From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org]
Sent: 25 August 2014 23:43
To: jrobinson@afilias.info
Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery
Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC
Importance: High

Hi,

It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :)

Thanks.

Amr

On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

All,

Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4^thSeptember 2014.

The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee

The motion will need to be seconded.

Thank-you,

Jonathan