-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] Re: A question to the candidate
From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
Date: Fri, October 14, 2011 9:41 am
To: <john@crediblecontext.com>
Cc: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>,
"Glen_de_Saint_Géry" <Glen@icann.org>


Thanks John. I am unsure whether you expect an answer by email or would prefer that we "stockpile" this question for the "Q&A with candidate" session that we have planned in Dakar?

I would think that the second option is better, as it means everyone can join the discussion as and when they wish.

Also, as I am leaving for Dakar tomorrow and will probably be out of email range for a few days, if anyone else has any questions that would mean I could address them all at the same time, which might work better.

Would you be OK with this?

Stéphane



Le 14 oct. 2011 à 17:16, <john@crediblecontext.com> a écrit :

> I forgot to switch my earlier email to plain text. Sorry all.
>
> Berard
>
>
> Stephane,
>
>
> As you think about how you might approach a second term as Chair of the
> Council, I wonder if you could give us your thoughts on this:
>
>
> In the “Discussion Paper on Next Steps to Produce a New Form of the
> RAA” sent to the Council yesterday by Kurt Pritz, is this:
>
>
> "We also note that disagreements in the GNSO Council regarding the
> process over the last year have resulted in delays in considering the
> substantive issues."
>
>
> This is not the first time or the softest way in which we have heard
> this criticism of delay and disharmony. How would you move to solve it?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Berard
>