Tim, I don't understand the 1st sentence - "The GNSO Council wishes to reiterate its support for the work of the Joint Applicant Support Working Group" - as support of all of the JAS-WG results (which could be seen as pre-endorsement) rather than as an ecouragement to continue in finding acceptable solutions for a given task. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@godaddy.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011 01:09 An: john@crediblecontext.com Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; owner-council@gnso.icann.org; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu Betreff: RE: AW: [council] Adrian's gameplan Sorry Mary, I didn't get to the end of the thread before replying. If you drop the first sentence, and add the without further delay as in my first suggestion, I think the RrSG would be more likely to approve. So it would be: "The GNSO Council unanimously believes that it is important for the new gTLD program to be globally inclusive, and to have as part of the implementation plan meaningful and workable mechanisms which will assist potential needy applicants, inter alia from developing regions of the world, participate in the first round of the new gTLD program as fully as possible without delaying the program rollout any further. We reiterate also our thanks to the members of the JAS WG for all their hard work in preparing the two Milestone Reports, and look forward to receiving its Final Report." Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: AW: [council] Adrian's gameplan From: <john@crediblecontext.com> Date: Sat, June 18, 2011 4:35 am To: Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu Cc: council@gnso.icann.org, owner-council@gnso.icann.org, KnobenW@telekom.de I am good with this. Berard -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: AW: [council] Adrian's gameplan From: <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> Date: Sat, June 18, 2011 2:25 am To: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org>, <KnobenW@telekom.de> Cc: <council@gnso.icann.org> I don't have a problem with that, Wolf-Ulrich i.e. your insertion and deleting the reference to "on behalf of our Cs and SGs". If I may, we can also consider deleting the last part of my draft, which means the statement will now read (with Wolf-Ulrich's suggested changes included): "The GNSO Council wishes to reiterate its support for the work of the Joint Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG). We unanimously believe that it is important for the new gTLD program to be globally inclusive, and to have as part of the implementation plan meaningful and workable mechanisms which will assist potential needy applicants, inter alia from developing regions of the world, participate in the first round of the new gTLD program as fully as possible. We reiterate also our thanks to the members of the JAS WG for all their hard work in preparing the two Milestone Reports, and look forward to receiving its Final Report." Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: <KnobenW@telekom.de>To:<Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu>, <owner-council@gnso.icann.org>CC:<council@gnso.icann.org>Date: 6/18/2011 5:20 AMSubject: AW: [council] Adrian's gameplan 1. See my insertion. I think "needy applicants" is to be seen in a wider range - as referenced in the JAS report, too. 2. The term "and on behalf of all our Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups" means (time-eating) co-ordination Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu Gesendet: Samstag, 18. Juni 2011 10:58 An: owner-council@gnso.icann.org Cc: 'GNSO Council List' Betreff: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan How about - "The GNSO Council wishes to reiterate its support for the work of the Joint Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG). We unanimously, and on behalf of all our Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups, believe that it is important for the new gTLD program to be globally inclusive, and to have as part of the implementation plan meaningful and workable mechanisms which will assist potential needy applicants [WUK: ] - inter alia from developing regions of the world[WUK: ] - participate in the first round of the new gTLD program as fully as possible. We reiterate also our thanks to the members of the JAS WG for all their hard work in preparing the two Milestone Reports, and look forward to receiving its Final Report so that recommendations for ensuring equal access to the new gTLD program can be discussed and implemented." I would suggest that, if we can, a statement such as this (tweaked as necessary) be issued to the community (including the Board and the GAC) as soon as possible :) Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: Rosemary Sinclair <" target=_blank>rosemary.sinclair@unsw.edu.au>;To:Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au>, "tim@godaddy.com" <tim@godaddy.com>, Stéphane Van Gelder<" target=_blank>stephane.vangelder@indom.com>;, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org>, "Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu" <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu>CC:"'GNSO Council List'" <council@gnso.icann.org>Date: 6/18/2011 4:48 AMSubject: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan Or that using a CWG when we do not have clear, agreed processes made progress on an issue where there was common commitment to doing "something" much more difficult for the WG members and the Council Given that we now have a unanimous position supporting the group's work I think Mary's original proposal was very useful as it took the content out of play and left our ongoing discussion to focus on process management issues....in this case implementation proposals rather than policy proposals.... I'd support Mary's original version Cheers Rosemary ________________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis [adrian@ausregistry.com.au] Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:48 PM To: tim@godaddy.com; Stéphane Van Gelder; owner-council@gnso.icann.org; Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu Cc: 'GNSO Council List' Subject: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan +1 Adrian Kinderis From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of tim@godaddy.com Sent: Saturday, 18 June 2011 3:48 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder; owner-council@gnso.icann.org; Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu Cc: 'GNSO Council List' Subject: Re: [council] Adrian's gameplan And that a cwg or jwg may not have been the appropriate mechanism for the issue. Tim ________________________________ From: Stéphane Van Gelder <" target=_blank>stephane.vangelder@indom.com>; Sender: owner-council@gnso.icann.org Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:09:47 +0200 To: <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> Cc: 'GNSO Council List'<council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Adrian's gameplan Thanks Mary, Would you be up for drafting a proposed statement, for the Council's consideration? Stéphane Le 18 juin 2011 à 09:01, <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu<mailto:>" target=_blank>Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu>>; a écrit : In partial follow-up to Adrian's point about possible deliverables and courses of action, I'd offer the suggestion I made during today's discussion, viz., that the GNSO Council consider circulating a brief statement to the ICANN community, stating its support for the work being done by the JAS WG and reiterating the importance of the issues they are considering. Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu<mailto:" target=_blank>mary.wong@law.unh.edu>; Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
From:
"Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@cctld.ru<mailto:>" target=_blank>andrei@cctld.ru>>; To: "'Adrian Kinderis'" <adrian@ausregistry.com.au<mailto:>" target=_blank>adrian@ausregistry.com.au>>;, "'GNSO Council List'" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:>" target=_blank>council@gnso.icann.org>>; Date: 6/18/2011 1:13 AM Subject: RE: [council] Adrian's gameplan I think adding "set and bind to the timelines" would be beneficial. Or there will be always a workaround for "endless discussion". --andrei From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:" target=_blank>owner-council@gnso.icann.org>; [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:56 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: [council] Adrian's gameplan As I discussed in the Working Session today. The four issues based on this discussion (as I see them); - Stephane speaking directly to the Board - Katim's email and the issues of the JAS WG o Processes within the Council - The future of Cross Community Working Groups o Publishing of reports etc - The optics of the GNSO Council and the promotion of its internal processes and representation o Multi stakeholder make up o Differing views/ differing It would be best, I think, to try and get some deliverables and courses of action in order to promote resolution. Adrian Kinderis