Chuck,

I think the approach you suggest for the Board dinner is excellent. To me, these dinners are crucial for us and the opportunity for interaction with Board members they bring. I would hate to see them disappear, but would like to understand why some on the Board feel they should go.

Stéphane

Le 21 mai 2010 à 02:18, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :

It is time for us to start thinking about discussion topics for our three regular joint meetings in Brussels: 1) GAC/GNSO meeting; 2) Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting; and 3) ccNSO/GNSO meeting.  To get discussion going, I listed some ideas below.

GAC/GNSO meeting

Janis suggested the following with my comments in parentheses:

·       DAG 4, including morality and public order (could be a lively discussion)

·       AoC, including A&T RT and next reviews

·       RAA (I believe that this is one where there is common interest in discussing)

·        IDN ccPDP (I don’t think this is very useful from a GNSO point of view, but maybe I am missing something)


Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting

·       There are rumblings that there are some on the Board who think this meeting has outlived its usefulness; in light of that, it might be useful to discuss the value or lack of value from both the GNSO and Board/Staff perspective.


ccNSO/GNSO meeting

·       DNS-CERT


Please comment on the above and feel free to suggest new topics.  I promised Janis and Chris I would get back to them.

Thanks, Chuck