Chuck, Some questions about your motion: (Resolution para. 1) Who do you anticipate will decide whether the individuals are qualified and what test will be applied in making that determination? (Resolution para. 2) Is "that have expertise related to the use of fast flux" intended to modify "groups" or "constituencies"? Also, one reading of this paragraph is that otherwise qualified individuals who are not affiliated with groups widely recognized as having expertise related to fast flux would be excluded from participating on the expert panel. Is that the intention? If so, a brief explanation for that exclusion would be helpful to me. On the other hand, "related to the use of fast flux" could be very broad. Is that the intention? Again, a brief explanation would be helpful. Many thanks. K ________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:57 AM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Alternate Fast Flux Motion Here is an alternate motion for consideration by the Council regarding the fast flux issue. Comments, questions and suggested amendments are welcome. Chuck