Thanks James. I think the broader the audience, the better. Best, Paul From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 10:42 AM To: Marika Konings; GNSO Council List (council@gnso.icann.org) Subject: Re: [council] For final review - GNSO Council letter on CCWG Accountability Third Draft Proposal Hi folks - Just a reminder that we are looking to transmit this to the CCWG -today-. So please give it one final review & let Marika & I know if you spot any errors or omissions. Also, if there are no objections, I propose that I could post this to the CCWG list in addition to sending it directly to the Co-Chairs. This would increase visibility and be a show of support for the GNSO participants on the CCWG. Any objections? Thanks- J. From: <owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 16:56 To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] For final review - GNSO Council letter on CCWG Accountability Third Draft Proposal Dear All, As discussed during today's meeting, please find attached the final version of the letter and accompanying table to the CCWG-Accountability, both in redline and clear version. Please review this version and if there are any issues that have been overlooked, please send those to the list by Friday 23.00 UTC at the latest. Thanks, Marika