All, can you please indicate if there are any concerns about the additional edit proposed by Tomslin by 19.00 UTC today (Wednesday) at the latest? If no concerns are raised, we’ll go ahead and submit the updated letter to our Board Support colleagues.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Tomslin Samme-Nlar via council <council@gnso.icann.org>
Reply to: Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 4 July 2023 at 16:00
To: Paul McGrady <paul@elstermcgrady.com>
Cc: "gnso-chairs@icann.org" <gnso-chairs@icann.org>, "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] NomCom Rebalancing response

 

Hi Paul,

 

Thanks alot. That suggestion works. For completeness, I also made a minor edit to Question #1. So here below is what I see as the proposed response which includes your suggestion:

 

  1.  
  2.  
  3. What does it mean to have a balanced
  4. NomCom at a point in time? For example, what criteria would you apply to measure or assess whether the NomCom is balanced? And further, how can one test whether or not the NomCom is balanced?
  5.  

GNSO Council response: The current NomCom structure is based on appointments made by bodies defined in the ICANN Bylaws ACs, SOs, SGs and Constituencies (https://www.icann.org/nomcom2023). Going by this structure, a balanced NomCom is one with all Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies equally represented and this also forms the measure of balanced.

 

  1.  
  2.  
  3. Do you support the view that the
  4. current composition of the NomCom needs to be rebalanced? Please explain why or why not.
  5.  

GNSO Council response: Composition of the NomCom is based on appointments made by bodies defined in the ICANN Bylaws. Article 8.2 of the ICANN Bylaws regarding NomCom composition refers to GNSO organizations as per Article 11. However, the only NCSG constituency listed is NCUC. Accordingly, Article 8.2 of the Bylaws should be amended to add a seat on the NomCom for NPOC. The GNSO Council supports rebalancing the current composition to allow for all GNSO Constituencies to appoint at least one delegate to the NomCom.

 

  1.  
  2.  
  3. How do you suggest that the NomCom’s
  4. composition be rebalanced?
  5.  

GNSO Council response: Addition of one seat in order to better represent the disparities amongst Constituencies representation and in order for NPOC to also be represented at the NomCom.

 

Happy to discuss further.

 

Warmly,

Tomslin

 

 

On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 22:45, Paul McGrady via council <council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:

Thanks Bruna, Mark, Farell, Tomslin, and Susan,

 

All, I think the reason for Susan’s proposed edit is coming from the current text which uses the singular article “a”, i.e. that at the end of the rebalancing each GNSO constituency would get “a” (singular) delegate to the Nom Com.

 

2.      Do you support the view that the current composition of the NomCom needs to be rebalanced? Please explain why or why not.

GNSO Council response: Composition of the NomCom is based on appointments made by bodies defined in the ICANN Bylaws. Article 8.2 of the ICANN Bylaws regarding NomCom composition refers to GNSO organizations as per Article 11. However, the only NCSG constituency listed is NCUC. Accordingly, Article 8.2 of the Bylaws should be amended to add a seat on the NomCom for NPOC. The GNSO Council supports rebalancing the current composition to allow for all GNSO Constituencies to appoint a delegate to the NomCom.

 

Combined with our request to add NPOC, this use of the singular article “a” could be read as the Council’s desire to remove one NomCom seat from the BC (which has 2) and give that to NPOC.  If that is not our will, we need to correct the singular article “a”, perhaps along the lines of “at least one.”  I think this makes more sense anyway, since why should we limit ourselves this early in the discussions when others in the community are certainly going to advocate for more seats for them while the Council, in the current draft, is advocating for simply reshuffling what we already have.

 

If it is our will, however, to eliminate one seat for the BC and transfer that seat to the NPOC, I don’t think we should hide a ball that big – let’s just say it directly.  I expect the BC reps may want to reply to this email.

 

For clarity, I think we should not include Susan’s addition, but modify our response on 2. to read:

 

2.      Do you support the view that the current composition of the NomCom needs to be rebalanced? Please explain why or why not.

GNSO Council response: Composition of the NomCom is based on appointments made by bodies defined in the ICANN Bylaws. Article 8.2 of the ICANN Bylaws regarding NomCom composition refers to GNSO organizations as per Article 11. However, the only NCSG constituency listed is NCUC. Accordingly, Article 8.2 of the Bylaws should be amended to add a seat on the NomCom for NPOC. The GNSO Council supports rebalancing the current composition to allow for all GNSO Constituencies to appoint at least one delegate to the NomCom.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

 

 

From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Bruna Martins dos Santos via council
Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 4:08 AM
To: Mark W. Datysgeld <mark@governanceprimer.com>
Cc: GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs@icann.org>; Julie Bisland via Gnso-secs <gnso-secs@icann.org>; COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG
Subject: Re: [council] NomCom Rebalancing response

 

Id like to also support Tomslin point on this matter. And I trust that the language that is on the document translates well NCSG's concerns regarding the addition of a seat in order to better represent the current configuration of GNSO at NomCom. And, in all honesty, I think this discussion is about remedying the lack of proper Non-Commercial representation at the committee, above all. 

 

Best, 

Bruna 

 

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 3:19 AM Mark W. Datysgeld via council <council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:

We could probably do with CPH or NomCom appointees input here.

---

Mark W. Datysgeld
Director at Governance Primer
ICANN GNSO Councilor


From: Farell FOLLY via council <council@gnso.icann.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2023 19:41
To: Tomslin Samme-Nlar
Cc: GNSO-Chairs; Julie Bisland via Gnso-secs; COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG
Subject: Re: [council] NomCom Rebalancing response

 

I would second Tomslin on this.

 

 

Best regards

@__f_f__

____________________________________

 

Lt-Colonel Farell FOLLY, Ir.

 

GNSO Councillor - ICANN (Los Angeles, USA).

 

 

 

 

 

On 2 Jul 2023, at 12:57, Tomslin Samme-Nlar via council <council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:

 

Dear Susan, all

 

I would like to politely disagree with the proposed change. I think section 4 as originally written answers the question of 'how' enough from a council perspective.

 

Warmly, 
Tomslin

 

On Sat, 1 July 2023, 02:30 Susan Payne via council, <council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:

Hi Sebastien

Thanks for this, and thanks to those who worked on the draft.  I have proposed one addition to section 4 : “For avoidance of doubt, we do not believe that this should be effected by removing any seats from other GNSO groups.”  I would trust that my Council colleagues would not disagree with this.

 

thanks

 

Susan Payne 
Head of Legal Policy 
Com Laude
T +44 (0) 20 7421 8250
Ext 255




We are pleased to launch our 
new YouTube channelImage removed by sender. . [comlaude.com]

[comlaude.com]

[comlaude.com]

 

The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that Com Laude Group Limited (the “Com Laude Group”) does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group is a limited company registered in England and Wales with company number 10689074 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 6181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176 and registered office at 15 William Street, South West Lane, Edinburgh, EH3 7LL Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, a corporation incorporated in the State of Washington and principal office address at Suite 332, Securities Building, 1904 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98101; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan with company number 0100-01-190853 and registered office at 1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan; Com Laude Domain ESP S.L.U., a company registered in Spain and registered office address at Calle Barcas 2, 2, Valencia, 46002, Spain. For further information see www.comlaude.com [comlaude.com]

_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (
https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. [comlaude.com]

<image003.png>_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (
https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. [comlaude.com]

_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (
https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. [comlaude.com]


[comlaude.com]

-- [comlaude.com]

_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.