-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] IRTP-D Motion
From: Mason Cole <mcole@5x5com.com>
Date: Wed, January 09, 2013 8:48 am
To: "council@gnso.icann.org List" <council@gnso.icann.org>

Council colleagues --

I move for the adoption of the attached motion during our next council meeting.  I would appreciate a second to the motion.

Thank you!

Mason

Initiation of a Policy Development Process (PDP) on the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D

Whereas

 

The Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) is an existing consensus policy under review by the GNSO;

 

The GNSO Transfers Working Group identified a number of issues in its review of the current Policy and those issues have been grouped into suggested PDPs, set A-E, as per the Council's resolution of 8 May 2008;

 

The GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on IRTP Part D at its meeting on 17 October 2012 (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/resolutions#20121017-4);

 

A Preliminary Issue Report on IRTP Part D was published on 14 November 2012 for public comment (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/irtp-d-prelim-issue-report-14nov12-en.htm).;

 

A Final Issue Report on IRTP Part D was published on 8 January 2012 (see [include link to Final Issue Report]);

 

The Final Issue Report recommends that the GNSO Council proceed with a Policy Development Process limited to consideration of the issues discussed in this report, and the General Counsel of ICANN has indicated the topic is properly within the scope of the ICANN policy process and within the scope of the GNSO

 

RESOLVED:

 

The GNSO will initiate a PDP on the issues defined in the Final Issue Report on the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part D ([include link to Final Issue Report]).

 

A Working Group will be created for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of the PDP.