I’m not sure why there is uncertainty.
This motion is related to the GNSO future. NCAs – as members of the council
– are part of the GNSO. They should undoubtedly given the opportunity to take
part in this effort – either being appointed themselves or appoint others.
Heather,
>
As I see it, only the houseless NCA falls into this category
Not sure - a
house is, as I see it, neither a constituency or a stakeholder group,
as the
whole concept of "houses" is, at least the way I see it, basically just
a
voting construct. But, again, I could be very wrong. And anyway, my
spell
checker keeps insisting "houseless" should be spelled
"horseless".
> but I assume any SG or C could nominate someone of
their choosing
> (not necessarily someone from within the SG/C).
I
guess so, yes - but (and now we are really getting into minor details,
but...)
can a NCA nominate anyone?
Julf