Thanks for the correction Stephane.  Not sure how I missed your second of motion 3.
 
Regarding the Council Operating Procedures requirement that motions should be submitted 8 days prior to a Council meeting, that requirement would apply to motion 2, motion 3 and motion 4.  In all three cases the Coucil would need to agree to an exception to the procedures requirement or we will have to delay action on all three topics.
 
Chuck

From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:43 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Motions for 17 Dec Council Meeting

Hi Chuck,

Your description is incorrect. I had seconded motion 3 on December 6.

Further, it is my assessment of the 8 day notice requirement set out by article 3.3 of the GNSO operating rules and procedures that motion 4, proposed by Wolf on Dec 13, cannot be submitted for our Dec 17 meeting.

I am happy to be corrected if this assessment is wrong.

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 13 déc. 2009 à 14:22, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :

For our 17 Dec Council meeting, the following four motions listed below with their status are posted at https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?17_december_motions):
  1. Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups (amended 4 Dec 09) - moved & seconded
  2. Motion to Approve the Alternative Proposal recommended by the Special Trademark Issues Review Team - needs to be moved and seconded
  3. Motion to delay decision regarding initiation of a Vertical Integration PDP - needs to be seconded
  4. Proposed Motion on Support for a PDP Work Team Face to Face Meeting - needs to be seconded
At this point, only motion 1 above is ready for action.  So we need someone to make motion 2 and, if that happens, we will need a second.  We also need seconds on motions 3 & 4. 
 
Chuck