+1 to Michele.Can't see any difficulties agreeing on such a statement on the GNSO Council level -- unless, of course, someone is against fiscal prudence and clear KPIs and ROI.Cheers,TanyaOn 2 February 2018 at 06:21, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:Arsene
A high level statement that urges ICANN to:
- Be fiscally prudent
- Track ROI and have clear KPIs
Is something that we should be able to agree on.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
------------------------------
- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
Ireland Company No.: 370845
From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.or
g > on behalf of Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday 1 February 2018 at 21:07
To: "mpsilvavalent@gmail.com" <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
I am sure sharing your experiences with the Council in an informational email would be great as to give an idea of the insides (pros and cons) of the fellowship to those (like the CPH) who might not have been involved in the Fellowship program or the NextGen program. So, please do go ahead and start an email thread, if you wish so.
As for a Council comment, i don't have any hard feelings about this but would strongly agree with Heather on the need to focus on what we have on our plate to cover and leave the SG/Cs to be heavily involved in putting together their own comment/answers to the question. Also, we are far from having the same understanding or the same view on these programs (even inside SGs), so it will be very difficult for us to agree, as a Council, on a joint statement.
Regards,
Arsene
------------------------
*Arsène Tungali*Co-Founder & Executive Director, Rudi international,
CEO, Smart Services Sarl, Mabingwa Forum
Tel: +243 993810967GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
2015 Mandela Washington Felllow (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil & Mexico) - AFRISIG 2016 - Blogger - ICANN's GNSO Council Member. AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius) - IGFSA Member - Internet Governance - Internet Freedom.
Check the 2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC report (English) and (French)
2018-02-01 23:06 GMT+03:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>:
I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the Council if they were needed.
On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council.
— Ayden
-------- Original Message --------
On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point.
SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment.
Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> wrote:
Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
Marie
From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.i
cann.org ] On Behalf Of Heather Forrest
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM
To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM
Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.o
rg by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj
Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
______________________________
_________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list
______________________________
_________________ council mailing list
______________________________
_________________ council mailing list
______________________________
_________________ council@gnso.icann.org
council mailing list
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council@gnso.icann.org
council mailing list
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council