Thank you, Greg.

That letter reached the BC this morning and I had a read. It is very much in alignment with everything we have discussed and what is being recommended by the Small Team.

I will incentivize the members to move ahead in drafting our letter so that we continue to add legitimacy and transparency to the process, leaving behind a solid trail of documents that validates this to the broader Internet community and something all stakeholders are getting behind.

Best,

Dear GNSO Councillors,

 

As you may recall, a recommendation in the DNS Abuse small team report was to consult with contracted parties re: potential issues with the existing accreditation agreements with ICANN.  It seems Contracted Parties may be ahead of the curve and have sent a CPH letter to ICANN org re: DNS Abuse provisions in their contracts (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/heineman-demetriou-to-marby-04nov22-en.pdf) .  I am flagging it here for everyone’s reference.

 

Thanks,

Greg

_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.