Thanks Marika!

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 2:06 AM
To: Paul McGrady; council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - revised motion re. DT to implement the GNSO's new roles and obligations

Thanks, Paul. With regards to your question concerning GNSO Supermajority, this is a defined term in the ICANN Bylaws: ‘A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority of the other House."

Best regards,

Marika

Marika Konings

Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Email: marika.konings@icann.org

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.

From: Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com>
Date: Thursday 30 June 2016 at 09:59
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: RE: [council] For your review - revised motion re. DT to implement the GNSO's new roles and obligations

Thanks Marika.

We are very close. I attach a slightly revised version making reference to GNSO Operating Procedures (which was the substance of Avri’s prior friendly amendment), and asking a question about the supermajority vote (this one is just based on my own ignorance – I’m not questioning/advocating an “if”, just the “how” of how it works).

With these tweaks, I think the motion is ready. Thanks!!

Best,

Paul

Paul D. McGrady Jr.

Partner

Chair, Trademark, Domain Names and Brand Enforcement Practice

Winston & Strawn LLP
35 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-9703

D: +1 (312) 558-5963

F: +1 (312) 558-5700

Bio | VCard | Email | winston.com

inston & Strawn LLP

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 12:00 PM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] For your review - revised motion re. DT to implement the GNSO's new roles and obligations

Dear All,

Following our discussion today, please find attached a revised version of the motion to create a DT to further develop recommendations to implement the GNSO’s new roles and obligations under the revised ICANN Bylaws which aims to capture the agreed approach with regards to the drafting team and subsequent approval. You will find attached a redline and a clean version (note, for some reason I am not able to get rid of the blue color in the redline document so it may be easier to review the clean version).