>
> That's just all the more reason to accept my amendment as friendly. If
> it is not considered friendly then it's clear to me that Rafik and Olga
> have something different in mind. Regardless of the Board motion
> mentioning it, this motion needs to be clear that it has picked up on
> that fact and that the WG will proceed accordingly. If that is not
> clear, it is unlikely the RrSG will support it.
>
> Tim
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON
> NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
> From: Alan Greenberg <
alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>
> Date: Tue, March 30, 2010 1:48 pm
> To: "GNSO Council " <
council@gnso.icann.org>
>
>
> Tim, the Boards motion, which is directly referenced in the proposed
> motion includes "Whereas, ICANN has a requirement to recover the
> costs of new gTLD applications and on-going services to new gTLDs".
> Why is it necessary to re-iterate it again?
>
> Alan
>
> At 30/03/2010 12:58 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>
>> Rafik,
>>
>> Then I'm confused because you said:
>>
>> "I think that there are misunderstandings about the working group and
>> its relation with the new gTLD process too.
>> - the working group should work on finding approaches for applicants
>> requiring assistance. it means that those applicants have anyway to
>> follow the same requirements like any other applicants. the assistance
>> may be technical (as suggested by Andrei) or/and financial (to find
>> structure/organizations to fund those projects, it is not ICANN which
>> will fund!)."
>>
>> All I am asking is that the motion is clarified to make your point - "it
>> is not ICANN which will fund!" Would you please propose such an
>> amendment that is acceptable? The RrSG would like to be able to support
>> the motion.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON
>> NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
>> From: Rafik Dammak <
rafik.dammak@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, March 30, 2010 11:33 am
>> To: "Gomes, Chuck" <
cgomes@verisign.com>
>> Cc: Tim Ruiz <
tim@godaddy.com>, GNSO Council <
council@gnso.icann.org>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> unfortunately, I cannot see it as friendly amendment.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2010/3/30 Gomes, Chuck <
cgomes@verisign.com>
>>
>> Rafik/Olga,
>>
>> Do you accept this as a friendly amendment?
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org
>>
>>
>>> [mailto:
owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
>>> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:20 PM
>>> To: GNSO Council
>>> Subject: RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING
>>> GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
>>>
>>>
>>> Since it seems to be agreed that what is intended is to look
>>> for funding opportunities outside of ICANN's own budget to
>>> possibly resolve this concern, I would like to make that
>>> evident in the motion and propose this friendly amendment:
>>>
>>> Add the following to the first Resolve:
>>>
>>> keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to recover the costs of
>>> new gTLD applications and on-going services to new gTLDs
>>>
>>> So the first Resolve would read:
>>>
>>> Resolved, that the GNSO Council supports the formation of a
>>> joint SO/AC working group to respond to the Board's request
>>> by developing a sustainable approach to providing support to
>>> new gTLD applicants requiring assistance in applying for and
>>> operating new gTLDS, keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to
>>> recover the costs of new gTLD applications and on-going
>>> services to new gTLDs;
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP
>>> ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
>>> From: Rafik Dammak <
rafik.dammak@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, March 24, 2010 9:43 am
>>> To: "Gomes, Chuck" <
cgomes@verisign.com>, Council GNSO
>>> <
council@gnso.icann.org>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I want to submit motion to approve joint SO/AC council
>>> working group on new gTLD applicant support the motion
>>> document is attached.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>