HI Greg and
Farzaneh,
Thank you both, we will get the motions wiki page updated shortly:
https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/JKifBg.
All the best,
Terri
From:
farzaneh badii via council <council@icann.org>
Reply-To: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 4:27 PM
To: "DiBiase, Gregory" <dibiase@amazon.com>
Cc: "Council@icann.org" <council@icann.org>
Subject: [council] Re: Motion re: Billing Contact
Hi Anne and Greg
I find Anne’s amendment friendly too and it should be accepted.
Farzaneh
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 4:37 PM DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com> wrote:
Thank you Anne. I accept the amendment as friendly.
Thanks,
Greg
From: Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 10:46 AM
To: Paul McGrady <paul@elstermcgrady.com>
Cc: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii@gmail.com>; DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com>; Council@icann.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [council] Re: Motion re: Billing Contact
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
Actually, this language from Paragraph 21 should probably appear as a RESOLVED clause rather than background:
RESOLVED, The GNSO Council confirms and commits that, going forward, it will be specified in Working Group Charters that if Working Groups intend to modify a requirement within the Registry Agreement, Registrar Accreditation Agreement, or Consensus Policy via Consensus Policy recommendations, the policy recommendations must explicitly and specifically identify which requirements are intended to be modified and how such requirements are recommended to be modified per their Consensus Policy recommendations.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:25 AM Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> wrote:
P.S. the language below in red is a proposed friendly amendment that would need to be accepted by the maker of the Motion (and probably the seconder as well?).
Anne
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:23 AM Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> wrote:
Regarding Paragraph 21, I think it's a good summary as to procedure but I think it needs to be much more specific as to a requirement in future WG Charters in relation to the following sentence.
The GNSO Council confirms and commits that, going forward, it will be specified in Working Group Charters that if Working Groups intend to modify a requirement within the Registry Agreement, Registrar Accreditation Agreement, or Consensus Policy via Consensus Policy recommendations, the policy recommendations must explicitly and specifically identify which requirements are intended to be modified and how such requirements are recommended to be modified per their Consensus Policy recommendations.
Thank you,
Anne
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 8:42 AM Paul McGrady via council <council@icann.org> wrote:
+1
The last sentence of paragraph 21 addresses concerns going forward. Thank you leadership! Much appreciated.
Best,
Paul
From: farzaneh badii via council <council@icann.org>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2025 10:35 AM
To: DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com>
Cc: Council@icann.org
Subject: [council] Re: Motion re: Billing Contact
Thank you Greg and the leadership team. I second the motion.
Farzaneh
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 11:24 AM DiBiase, Gregory via council <council@icann.org> wrote:
- Attachment protected by Amazon:
- Billing Contact Motion.docx [us-west-2.secure-attach.amazon.com]
Amazon has replaced the attachment in this email with a download link. Downloads will be available until April 27, 2025, 15:24 (UTC+00:00). Tell us what you think [amazonexteu.qualtrics.com]
For more information click here [docs.secure-attach.amazon.com]
Hello All,
Please see the attached motion in which the GNSO Council would confirm to ICANN that the EPDP Team did intend to modify the current Registrar Accreditation Agreement requirements related to billing contact, and that the current RAA requirements for the collection, retention, and escrow of billing contact have been eliminated by the Registration Data Policy.
We have added language noting the exceptional circumstances surrounding this issue. We are also cognizant that several Councilors preferred a different approach to resolving this issue. We appreciate this perspective, however, given the amount of discussion to date, Leadership believes a putting this matter to vote is the appropriate next step. We appreciate everyone’s thoughtful comments on this matter and hope we can resolve at April’s meeting.
Thanks,
Greg
_______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on._______________________________________________
council mailing list -- council@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.