I think it's an interesting idea - but I also see the risk for it to turn into a free-for-all of national or interest group sections peeved at certain Internet governance developments.

I didn't hear so many complaints from other NCPH side colleagues about 'growing executive influence over policy' during the TCMH debacle, so colour me curious about this initiative, willing to be convinced - subject to a fair methodology that won't be astro-turfed -  but also somewhat skeptical of the context and motivation.

Maria


On 20 February 2014 21:11, <john@crediblecontext.com> wrote:
James,
 
Yes, we should include all, but the ball has to start rolling somewhere.  I figure we can do that.
 
Berard
 
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>
Date: 2/20/14 1:01 pm
To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@haven2.com>, "John Berard" <john@crediblecontext.com>
Cc: "Council" <council@gnso.icann.org>

Also think this is worth of discussion, but should include other SO/ACs in an effort to provide a “360” review.
 
J.
 
 
From: Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com>
Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 13:35
To: John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO
 
hi John,
 
i sense a certain irony in your reference to crowdsourcing, but i went ahead and circulated your proposal amongst the ISPCP — initial reactions are positive.  i personally think it’s a great idea.
 
mikey
 

On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:28 AM, john@crediblecontext.com wrote:

All,
 
I think the next meeting of the ICANN, scheduled for London, marks two years of Fadi Chehade's term as the organization's President and CEO.  In light of the interest driven by the Strategy Panels in what is called crowd sourcing, I wonder if we should consider instigating a performance review of the executive using that method.
 
We can announce the initiative in Singapore and prepare a report for the London meeting.  The standing for the Council is the growing executive influence over policy, looking no further than the rise of appointed strategy panels in lieu of community-based working groups.
 
What is your view?
 
Cheers,
 
Berard




PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)