In advance of our consideration of this motion I want to propose a couple amendments (re just a typo) and ask a few questions that hopefully can be answered on the list before our meeting on the 18th.

 

Resolved 1(a)

·         The second sentence of this part of the resolution says, “Financial need has been established as the primary criterion for support. The group should be argumented to have the necessary expertise to make a specific recommendation in this area, especially given the comparative economic conditions and the cross-cultural aspects of this requirement.”

·         Proposed amendment (typo correction):  In 1(a) under Resolved, change ‘argumented’ to ‘augmented’.

·         Have the experts needed been identified yet?  If not, how will they be identified?

·         Is it anticipated that adding experts will require funding?  If so, from where would the funding come?

 

Resolved 1(c)

·         The resolution says, “Establishing a framework, including a possible recommendation for a separate ICANN originated foundation, for managing any auction income, beyond costs. for future rounds and ongoing assistance”.

·         What does ‘ICANN originated foundation’ mean?

·         Has this idea been vetted with the ICANN General Council’s office?

 

Resolved 1(h)

·         The resolution says, “Review the basis of the US$100,000 application base fee to determine its full origin and to determine what percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance.”

·         Understanding that the application fees are intended to cover application processing costs and no more, from where is it envisioned that the offset of the fee waivers would come?

·         Proposed amendment: Add a new sentence that says, “Work with the ICANN new gTLD implementation staff to determine how the fee waivers would be funded.”

 

If the answers to the questions can be provided in advance of the Council meeting on 18 November, I think the chances of acting on this motion on the 18th will be increased and the sooner the better so that Councilors can provide the answers to their respective groups.

 

Rafik/Bill:  Do you consider the two proposed amendments as friendly?

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:30 PM
To: rafik.dammak@gmail.com
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Announcement from JAS working group

 

Rafik

 

While it might have been preferable to get this from another SG, to move things along I second your motion on the JAS WG charter extension.

 

Best

 

Bill

 

 

On Nov 12, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:



Hi,

 

regarding the JAS working, an announcement was just posted at ICANN website about the milestone report http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11nov10-en.htm

 

Regards

 

Rafik

 

Developing Economies and the New gTLD Program

11 November 2010

A message from the JAS WG:

The Milestone Report [PDF, 1.2 MB] and accompanying Addenda [PDF, 1.07 MB] published for public comment today deals with a very important issue: how can ICANN assist applicants from developing economies to increase their participation in the new generic Top-Level Domain (New gTLD) Program?

A Working Group (WG) formed by ICANN stakeholders has been working since April 2010 to address this issue. This followed a Resolution from ICANN Board of Directors in Nairobi, on March 2010 that asked ICANN’s stakeholder community

"...to develop a sustainable approach to providing support to applicants
requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDs."

Here are some basic aspects of this important work.

  1. What is this all about? What is a Milestone Report?

The Milestone Report is a document produced by this Working Group that offers recommendations on how ICANN should develop a sustainable approach to providing support to applicants from developing economies requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDs Registries. The Report proposes initial criteria for qualification as well as several other types of support to be considered, for example, technical, informational.

Although this work presents the foundation for ICANN to establish a Support Development Program dedicated to this issue, the work is not final yet. This report is going to be considered by the Board, staff and ICANN’s supporting chartering organizations.

This initiative is related to the New gTLD Program, which in the near future will allow entities from around the world to apply for a generic top-level domain. The applicants passing the evaluation process, will sign a contract with ICANN and run a Registry.

  1. Who is being considered to receive support? Who benefits from this?

The Working Group is proposing the following group to be eligible for support once the "need" criterion is met:

    • Community-based applications such as cultural, linguistic and ethnic;
    • Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs), civil society and not-for-profit organizations;
    • Applicants geographically located in emerging markets/developing countries;
    • Applications in languages whose presence on the web is limited;
    • Entrepreneurs wanting to serve a developing market that might not be sustainable under the current cost structure.

At this phase, the Working Group has not adopted any specific classification for developing economies and recommends using a classification that is internationally agreed upon, for example, G-77 or United Nations or World Bank classifications.

We all benefit from this initiative. The Internet belongs to all as well as the responsibility to look into effective ways to reduce the Digital Divide, in this particular case, by delivering a sustainable and critical support for applicants from developing economies and looking for a solution not only at the application phase but also through to the initial years of these new Registry operators.

  1. Why is it important?

It is important because the Internet is a virtual real estate that belongs to everyone. Entities from around the world should be able to increase their participation in the top-level expansion. The Working Group also stresses it is important not only to increase participation from developing economies, but also to increase the likelihood of success by these new participants that will be delivering Domain Name Services (DNS).

The current New gTLD Program, as design, has an evaluation (and several other fees) that are considered high for a significant number of potential participants from around the world. Besides the issue of high fees, the program is in English only and has an evaluation process with criteria and requirements that are quite complex to navigate.

  1. What are the highlights of this report?

This report approached the issue of accessibility from several angles. First, there are recommendations to lower the fees for applicants the meet the criteria recommended by this group. The initial focus is on a relatively limited and identifiable set of potential applicants that is often considered not controversial to support. The main criterion for eligibility is "need". The detailed definition of financial need and the method for determining the needs of an application will be part of a continued work.

  1. Who is part of this Working Group?

This Working Group, also called Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support or simply "JAS WG", is comprised of highly respected and experienced volunteers from the Supporting Organization and the Advisory Committee. This all-volunteer group teleconferences twice each week, and works through a wiki and mailing lists. These active contributors are located in Australia, Africa, Europe and North America.

  1. What happens next?

Few things will happen in the upcoming months:

    • The general public is strongly encouraged to participate in the public forum that can be found here:http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201012-en.htm#jas-milestone-report
    • The Board, staff, supporting organizations will review the Milestone Report and public comments received.
    • The Supporting organizations and Board will allow for the continuation of this initiative, which means that this or a new Working Group will carry this work to a next phase.
    • Staff might initiate working on the Support Development Program, depending on the Board’s direction.
  1. How can one get involved?

One way to get involved is to provide a feedback using ICANN’s public comment forum. This is one of the ways ICANN listens to the global Internet community. You can find the link to this forum here:http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201012-en.htm#jas-milestone-report. The public forum will close on 15 December 2010.

If you feel strongly about this (and other Internet related issues) attend ICANN Meetings – in person or remotely. The next one is in Cartagena beginning of December).

  1. Where to find more information?

Relevant Resolutions:

Information about the New gTLD Program: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm

Archive regarding the WG activities:

 

 

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland

william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch
www.williamdrake.org

***********************************************************