Steve:
I have raised this within the BC and so far all the feedback favors delay of publication to September 3 to allow for Council review, followed by an extended
public comment period of greater than 40 days so that it closes post-Dublin.
Best regards, Philip
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org]
On Behalf Of Steve Chan
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 4:27 PM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] - Preliminary Issue Report - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
Dear Councilors,
Staff is on track to be able to deliver the Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures for public comment by the end of August, as discussed on
the previous GNSO Council meeting. However, I wanted to note that during the meeting, the possibility of providing for an extended public comment period was also discussed, which would keep it open through the ICANN54 meeting. This topic is expected to be
on the agenda for the next Council meeting, scheduled for 03 September and as such, it may make sense to delay the publication of the report by approximately 3 days to allow for discussion during the meeting and a decision to be made, to avoid confusion from
possibly amending the comment close date. The impact appears to be minimal:
Staff is leaning towards waiting the three days and
immediately putting in the request to publish the Preliminary Issue Report after a decision is made, but wanted to be sure there were no strong objections to this approach.
Best,
Steven Chan
Sr. Policy Manager
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
steve.chan@icann.org
direct: +1.310.301.3886
mobile: +1.310.339.4410
tel: +1.310.301.5800
fax: +1.310.823.8649