Pam's suggestion strikes me as worth evaluating, too.

Ayden Férdeline



‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 22 March 2018 8:26 PM, Anthony Harris <harris@cabase.org.ar> wrote:

I support Pam’s suggestion.

 

Tony Harris

 


Logo

Antonio Harris
Director Ejecutivo

Cámara Argentina de Internet
Suipacha 128 - 3 "F" - Tel: (5411) 5263-7456
harris@cabase.org.ar · www.cabase.org.ar

 facebook twitter linkedIn 

eco No me imprimas si no es necesario. Protejamos el medio ambiente

 

 

De: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] En nombre de PAMELA LITTLE
Enviado el: miércoles, 21 de marzo de 2018 0:55
Para: Heather Forrest; GNSO Council List; Austin, Donna
Asunto: Re: [council] [EXTERNAL] Fwd: [soac-chairs] ccNSO Council resolves not to participate in RDS/WHOIS2

 

In addition to bandwidth issue and in light of the discussions around ICANN budget and GDPR at ICANN61, perhaps the community should consider a deferral/pause of this review.  

 

Also, see below excerpt of Goran's latest blog https://www.icann.org/news/blog/budget-discussions-at-icann61:

 

"...and for the RDS Review, there is still significant work remaining to address the impacts of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on the WHOIS system. Delaying either of these reviews would save many hours of volunteer time. Additionally, and more broadly, addressing the timing of reviews, and approach, will contribute to discussing how to make future reviews more efficient and more relevant. Deferring a review that will be impacted by current Policy Development Processes or other outside factors, could have significant savings on productivity and cost."

 

Kind regards,

 

Pam

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

Sender:Austin, Donna via council <council@gnso.icann.org>

Sent at:2018 Mar 21 (Wed) 07:34

To:Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>; GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>

Subject:Re: [council] [EXTERNAL] Fwd: [soac-chairs] ccNSO Council resolves not to participate in RDS/WHOIS2

 

Heather, Susan

 

Where does this leave the RDS Review Team in terms of adequate membership? I know Susan has raised concerns previously that there isn’t enough people to do the work.

 

Is it possible for the GNSO to recommend additional candidates to fill the vacancies left by the ccNSO’s decision not to appoint volunteers?

 

Donna

 

From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Heather Forrest
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 10:51 AM
To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [council] Fwd: [soac-chairs] ccNSO Council resolves not to participate in RDS/WHOIS2

 

Dear Council colleagues,

 

Please note the ccNSO's affirmed position on RDS/WHOIS2 RT.

 

Best wishes,

 

Heather

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>
Date: Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM
Subject: [soac-chairs] ccNSO Council resolves not to participate in RDS/WHOIS2
To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>

7 March 2018

 

To: Alan Greenberg, RDS/WHOIS 2 Review Team, Chair

CC: Chris Disspain, Mike Silber, Göran Marby, Chairs of ALAC, ASO, GAC, GNSO, SSAC, RSAC 

 

 

Dear Alan,

 

In May 2017, we informed the ICANN Board of Directors that the ccNSO did not find itself in a position to nominate candidates for the RDS/ WHOIS2 Review Team, and deferred participation in this specific review. 

 

On 18 January 2018, the ccNSO Council again discussed its participation in the review. Following this discussion, by 16 February 2018, the ccNSO Council decided not to participate in the RDS/WHOIS2 specific review.

 

The ccNSO Council thanks the volunteers who sought endorsement of the ccNSO.

 

Kind regards,

 

Katrina Sataki,

Chair of the ccNSO 

 


_______________________________________________
soac-chairs mailing list