Thanks John.

I will incorporate these into the latest draft and circulate right away.

Jonathan

From: john@crediblecontext.com [mailto:john@crediblecontext.com]
Sent: 28 April 2014 21:50
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] BC edits to the current proposed GNSO Council response to the call for Public Comment - ICANN Strategy Panels Draft Report

All,

I had sent this directly to the drafting team but at Jonathan's suggestion, I now send them to the full Council.

Cheers,

Berard

--------- Original Message ---------

Subject: BC edits to the current proposed GNSO Council response to the call for Public Comment - ICANN Strategy Panels Draft Report
From: john@crediblecontext.com
Date: 4/22/14 7:13 am
To: jrobinson@afilias.info, "Thomas Rickert" <rickert@anwaelte.de>
Cc: "Gabriela Szlak" <gabrielaszlak@gmail.com>

Jonathan, Thomas:

At this point, the BC has confirmed is opposition to offering a comment as a matter of policy, but has little quarrel with the thrust of the comment.

With this in mind, I offer the attached which redlines some of the language that can help make the point even as it reinforces the policy role of the Council.

Cheers,

Berard