Thanks Mary.  Just a quick question on Rec 9.  Why would there need to be a review of whether or not to include the IPC comments?  Everyone else’s comments were included, so I don’t know why the IPCs would be subject to a review to see if they would be included.  Thanks for your thoughts.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

 

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 8:17 AM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [council] Action items from GNSO Council call on 17 January regarding the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

 

Dear all,

 

Here are the notes that staff took in relation to action items stemming from the Special GNSO Council meeting that just concluded. Please let us know if we have missed or mischaracterized anything.

 

ACTION ITEMS:

  • Letter explaining GNSO Council response - James to prepare draft for Council consideration before 21 January, assisted by Keith and Ed
  • Rec 5, 11 - James to draft additional language along the lines of what was discussed/agreed on the call, assisted by Ed and Paul
  • Rec 1 - reinsert BC note about strong right of inspection (perhaps with cross-reference in/to Rec 3?)
  • Rec 2 - change "unanimous support" to "broad support"
  • Rec 3, 4 - no change
  • Rec 6 - remove last sentence; add note that certain questions remain to be resolved in WS2
  • Rec 7 - no change
  • Rec 8 – further elaboration needed on note about timeliness (including replies and deadlines)
  • Rec 9 - Review whether IPC comment on AOC section 8(b) and direct constituency participation in review teams should be included; review generally for accuracy
  • Rec 10 - emphasize need for it to be a community-led effort
  • Rec 12 - no change

Staff will follow up with James and the various Council volunteers to ensure that you have the updates as soon as practicable.

 

Thanks and cheers

Mary

 

 

Mary Wong

Senior Policy Director

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Telephone: +1-603-5744889

 


The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.