Hi Liz, all, I do not think that it would be a problem for persons/groups to identify themselvs in the mail body. I'm not aware of any kind of automated redaction at this point. Best, tom liz.gasster schrieb:
Thanks Kristina. Apparently that redaction feature is a straightforward algorithm in email but is more complex to employ to delete partial portions of text in an on-line form. I'm sure it could be mastered nonetheless. I was excited to get the online form working given time deadlines and opted for prudence and expediency.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 1:29 PM To: liz.gasster@icann.org; Thomas Keller Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Whois study suggetsions
Steve DelBianco submitted them on behalf of NetChoice. He gave me permission to REVEAL and asked that I let you all know he is happy to answer any questions anyone may have about the study proposals.
Liz, I know that some - but not all - of my contact information is redacted when I post to the Council list from my Blackberry (which has that pesky automatic e-signature). Perhaps the method used there could be cross applied here?
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of liz.gasster Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:13 PM To: 'Thomas Keller' Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Whois study suggetsions
Hi Tom,
Yes, I take your overall point! As to the details of how this came about, the answer has more of a technical reason, not so much a policy rationale. I wanted to solicit full reach information (which is not usually the case for public comments) so that I could follow up and ask clarifying questions if need be, without revealing all info to the world, but couldn't separate the "name and affiliation" from the reach info, so we opted to blank out all from the public view.
I guess I'll operate like an OPOC in this case...I will RELAY but not REVEAL!
Liz
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Keller Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:50 AM To: 'GNSO.SECRETARIAT@GNSO.ICANN.ORG'; 'Council GNSO' Subject: AW: [council] Whois study suggetsions
Hello,
What strikes me as very strange is that everyone who registeres a domain name in the gTLD world will be held out to the public but persons/groups that suggest further studies on this issue are
Submitted By: [Redacted for privacy reasons]
protected.
Best,
tom
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von GNSO.SECRETARIAT@GNSO.ICANN.ORG Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 19:52 An: 'Council GNSO' Betreff: [council] Whois study suggetsions
Dear Council members,
The 3 study suggestion responses to topics of study on WHOIS may be directly viewed at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00001.html http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00002.html http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00003.html
These are published on page: http://www.icann.org/public_comment/ and by clicking on the link at the bottom of the text marked [comments], http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/ the studies may be seen along with any comments that may be submitted.
Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks you. Kind regards,
Glen
-- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org