Mike,
 
First of all, it seems to me that the following 'whereas' clause is a resolution and covered in that part of the motion, so I think it could be deleted:  "Whereas, notwithstanding the recommendations in the Issues Report, the GNSO Council has decided to initiate a PDP on vertical integration between registries and registrars; and"
 
Debbie - As the seconder of the motion, do you consider it a friendly amendment?
 
Do any Councilors need more time to vet this amendment with their SGs and/or Constituencies?
 
Chuck
 
 


From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:32 AM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: FW: FW: [council] FW: Draft Motions on Vertical Integration

All,

 

Attached please find a somewhat redrafted motion in support of a PDP, which I accept in its entirety as a friendly amendment to my pending motion.

 

Thanks,

Mike

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

http://rodenbaugh.com