Hi Marie,

 

While it’s great to remember we have this alternative, I think it’s premature to revisit this discussion until we have definitive guidance from the Board.  As it stands, we don’t actually know how the Board is thinking about these recommendations.  To consider modifying approved recommendations is a significant step that should not be taken lightly and without complete information.

 

Thanks,

Greg

 

From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Marie Pattullo - AIM via council
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 1:56 AM
To: council@gnso.icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [council] SSAD

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Dear all,

 

Further to our conversation last week about the SSAD, there does seem to be some concern from ICANN org that it will be extremely expensive both to establish and to run. I’d like to throw the attached back into our thinking; as you may remember, Alex Deacon presented this idea to the Board back in October 2020, showing that we can get a disclosure request ticketing system up and running with existing software and thus at minimal cost.

 

Perhaps it’s time to revisit this idea?

 

Kind regards

 

Marie

 

 

Marie Pattullo

Senior Trade Marks and Brand Protection Manager

  

European Brands Association

Avenue des Gaulois 9 · 1040 Brussels · Belgium

T: +32 2 736 03 05

M: +32 496 610 395

E: marie.pattullo@aim.be

W: www.aim.be

EU Transparency Register: 1074382679-01

LinkedIn icon Twitter icon