I accept as friendly.

Tim

From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
Sender: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:20:33 +0200
To: Adrian Kinderis<adrian@ausregistry.com.au>
Cc: GNSO Council List<council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment

Thanks Adrian.

Tim, Jonathan, how say you?

Stéphane



Le 21 juin 2011 à 12:17, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :

Further to my email below I’d like to suggest the following amendment;
 
Proposed amendment:
 
Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause:
 
Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.
 
 
Adrian Kinderis

 
 
From: Adrian Kinderis 
Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
 
All,
 
Much to Glen’s displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to the IRTP-B Motion.
 
The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a common position on the complete motion.
 
I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head’s up.
 
Thanks.
 

Adrian Kinderis