Fully agreed, we should follow-up with the discussin at the council session. Sorry for having been late. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@anwaelte.de] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 12:57 An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich Cc: <council@gnso.icann.org> Betreff: Re: [council] WhoIs motion Wolf, I find it diffiult to consider the changes made while following discussions on other important matters. Please do not assume I don't have any comments just because I could not yet work on that. Thanks, Thomas ============= thomas-rickert.tel +49.228.74.898.0 Am 27.06.2012 um 12:18 schrieb <KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de>>: No comments have been received so far. Glen, could you please update the motion by the revised version attached? Thanks Wolf-Ulrich ______________________________________________ Von: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 01:06 An: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Betreff: WhoIs motion All, following the council discussion last weekend on the WhoIs motion the ISPCP constituency discussed today the matter and came to the conclusion to provide this motion in an amended form as attached. I hope this brings more clarity on the reference as well as on the target. As there is still room for discussion I would appreciate your comments. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich <ISPCP - Motion to Address Whois.doc>