Dear Jeff,

Happy to treat as friendly.

Also may I suggest that in order to ensure that there is no confusion as a result of the Resolutions that the Council may possibly be disregarding the OTHER RAP WG/RAP IDT recommendations, an appropriate WHERAS be added that in gist says that the Council acknowledges the extensive work of the RAP WG/RAP IDT and their recommendations and the following Resolutions do not mean that the Council has disregarded the other recommendations which will be addressed in due course by the Council.

We need to move on these issues as Council and at the same time ensure fulfilling our role as Policy Managers respecting the bottom up policy making process.

Sincerely,

Zahid Jamil

Barrister-at-law

Jamil & Jamil

Barristers-at-law

219-221 Central Hotel Annexe

Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan

Cell: +923008238230

Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025

Fax: +92 21 35655026

www.jamilandjamil.com

Notice / Disclaimer

This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: 03 February 2011 07:14
To: Neuman, Jeff; 'GNSO Council'
Subject: [council] CORRECTION: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's Amendment to RAP motion

All,

It is my understanding that despite the original author of a motion wanting the withdraw, the motion may indeed still be on the table if 2 Councilors support the motion staying on the table. I cannot say whether that will happen, but in the event it does (or if it comes up later), I have to correct the Friendly Amendment proposed by the Registries. It should read:

· Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements by registrars who adopt them, and for use by TLD operators who adopt them.

So the full amendment would read:

RESOLVED #3, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on the creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries address the illicit use of domain names in accordance with Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Final Report.

This effort should consider (but not be limited the following subjects:

• Practices for identifying stolen credentials

• Practices for identifying and investigating common forms of malicious use (such as malware and phishing)

• Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements by registrars who adopt them, and for use by TLD operators who adopt them.

• Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain registered by abusers

• Practices for suspending domain names

• Account access security management

• Security resources of use or interest to registrars and registries

• Survey registrars and registries to determine practices being used, and their adoption rates.

I hope this is still treated as friendly.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

From: Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 3:14 PM
To: 'GNSO Council'
Subject: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's Amendment to RAP motion

All,

The RySG is proposing a friendly amendment to Zahid’s proposed amendment to the RAP Motion. We understand Zahid’s motion is not considered friendly by Tim, so there will be a vote on Zahid’s proposal. As discussed on an RySG call this morning, the RySG will support Zahid’s proposed amendment if his motion is amended by adding the word “possible” in the sentence:

· Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements, and for use by TLD operators.

So the full amendment would read:

This effort should consider (but not be limited the following subjects:

• Practices for identifying stolen credentials

• Practices for identifying and investigating common forms of malicious use (such as malware and phishing)

• Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements, and for use by TLD operators.

• Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain registered by abusers

• Practices for suspending domain names

• Account access security management

• Security resources of use or interest to registrars and registries

• Survey registrars and registries to determine practices being used, and their adoption rates.

The rationale is that the premise of the work is for the creation of non-binding best practices and adding this word is in line with that notion. We hope this will be considered friendly.

Thanks.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / jeff.neuman@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz