This sounds very sensible to me. 

David

On 2 Sep 2014, at 11:51 pm, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

All,

 

This needs to be tidied up . The motions appear identical but mine actually has a couple of minor changes to the wording.

 

Therefore, I propose the following:

 

1.       That my wording is a friendly amendment to David’s motion (hopefully acceptable to David & Amr)

2.       I withdraw my motion and we remove the confusion of the two (near) identical motions.

 

Thanks,

 

 

Jonathan

 

From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] 
Sent: 25 August 2014 23:43
To: jrobinson@afilias.info
Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery
Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC
Importance: High

 

Hi,

 

It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :)

 

Thanks.

 

Amr

 

On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

All,

 

Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4^thSeptember 2014.

 

The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee

 

The motion will need to be seconded.

 

Thank-you,

 

 

Jonathan

<Motion - Appointment of GNSO Liaison to the GAC (25 August 2014).docx>