Adding to Michele's point, guidance we got from our stakeholder group would require us to vote down either the amendment or the motion if it incorporates such changes. 


Rubens
RySG


Em 14 de ago de 2017, à(s) 11:37:000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> escreveu:

Rafik
 
This topic has been discussed on multiple occasions at the GNSO Council. Council’s issues with the CCWG have been made very clear. Asking that the motion be modified as you’re suggesting with the addition of the new #4 seems to completely ignore the various exchanges we’ve had on this topic over the last few months. Personally I could not support the motion with this additional language.
 
Regards
 
Michele 
 
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
 
From: <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>
Date: Monday 14 August 2017 at 14:45
To: Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [council] Proposed amendments to CCWG-IG motion
 
Hi all,
 
please find attached a document with proposed amendments to the CCWG-IG motion that was deferred in the last council call.
I hope they can be accepted as friendly.
 
Best,
 
Rafik
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council