Agree we should discuss some clarifications/improvements and address any missing steps.  I notice there's no mention of how the Board receives and considers input from other SO/ACs about GAC's advice, which has been a problem for the GNSO in the past.

Darcy

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> wrote:
On 09-03-18 17:45, Austin, Donna via council wrote:

> It's unclear to me who owns or who drafted this document. Is it the
Board, the GAC, ICANN?

My apologies for not responding sooner, but I was travelling to ICANN61,
and while there had been some scaremongering about power outages
in Puerto Rico, I wasn't prepared to find out, as I landed in Atlanta on
my way, that a large part of Amsterdam had been without power for more
than 8 hours (taking down, among other things, my mail server).

As has become clear, it is an informal staff document. I agree with
the view expressed by several people here that we should take
some effort to get it improved just in case it gets used as a shorthand
for the proper procedure.

    Julf


_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council